Before the economic recession, commercial casinos accumulated at least $30 billion in revenues every year from 2005 through 2008. During this period, casino owners built new facilities and expanded the size of the present facilities. As a consequence of the recession US commercial casino construction has come to a halt and casino operators are focused on facility cost reduction. Increasingly, casino operators are benefiting from the Epact IRC section 179D commercial building energy efficiency tax provisions, which have been extended through 2013. Epact tax deductions are available for qualifying energy reductions in lighting, HVACheating, ventilation, and air conditioning, and building envelope. Building envelope includes the building’s foundation, walls, roof, windows, and doors, all of which control the flow of energy between the interior and exterior of the building.

casino betting

Commercial casinos often encompass hotel resorts, which offer packages of services for their customers. Casinos are suited to Epact due to parking garages, hotel occupancy rooms, meeting halls, and their gaming floors. Each of these features consumes the Epact advantage and square footage has a potential for as many as 60 cents per square foot for each of the three steps. Some of the commercial casinos are about feet while American casinos are over feet. Among the biggest ones is nearly two million square feet. Hotels are the most preferred of Section 179 construction category. Reporting casinos comprise Boyd Gaming Corporation, Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc., and MGM Mirage. They have projects including significant energy savings through cogeneration, ERVenergy recovery ventilation, more efficient HVAC units, replacing incandescent lighting with energy efficient lightings, windows with energy efficient day light systems, solar thermal storage and other energy saving initiatives. This contact form

The principle to qualify for the department 179D light tax deduction makes casinos and especially casino resorts the property class. The principle set requires at least a 25 percent watts-per-square foot reduction when compared with the 2001 ASHRAE American Society of heating refrigeration and air conditioning engineers building energy code standard. Tax deduction is reached with a 40 foot reduction in comparison with the ASHRAE 2001 standard. 40 decreases, which mean that, will qualify for the Epact tax deduction is required by the building code standard.